On 6/4/17 2:47 PM, L A Walsh wrote:
> ----
> Clarification, please, but it looks like with your
> patch below, Unicode in variable names might be fairly close
> to being achieved? Seeing how it was done for functions,
> gave you insight into how variables could be done, yes?
No. It's not `done' for functions at all.
> Why do you call it "terrible"?
Because it's a quick and dirty implementation that may not work in all
cases and has several obvious problems (memory leaks, etc.).
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
