On 4/19/16 7:52 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:45:27AM -0700, David Maas wrote:
>> Running the echo and other contents of the function really doesn't seem
>> like the correct behavior. If the function isn't called, then its contents
>> shouldn't be executed.
>
> I believe the theory is the syntax error is confusing the parser to the
> point where it can't even tell that it's supposed to be in a function
> definition. So it starts reading and executing lines of code.
This is wrong.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
