On 13 Jan 2016 8:14 p.m., "Andreas Schwab" <sch...@suse.de> wrote:
> I don't think so. > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_07 > doesn't mention pipelines. That was rather my point. Given that they aren't mentioned, one has to take them as read, otherwise even ( ( foo 2>&1 ) | bar ) won't work as advertised.
