On 10/17/15, Linda Walsh <b...@tlinx.org> wrote:
> Ok, thinking this from a different way.
>
> shopt -s implicit_vars_local
> or
> shopt -s localize_func_implicit_vars.... whatever...
>
> Right now, in a function, you *can* use local in a function
> to make a local var. Thing is, both 'declare' and 'typeset' also
> make a *local* var in a function, unless the "-g" switch is used.
>
> I.e. All standard, overt ways (local declare typeset) of creating
> a var in a function all result in it being local, BUT,
> (and I think this is an ugly wart),
> any *implicit vars* without local, or the
> misleading declare or typeset, become global.
>
> examples: In these two for statements, used in functions, 'i'
> becomes global:
>
> for((i=0; i<10; ++i)); do : done
> for i in {1..10}; do : done
>
> And same with 'myarray':
> readarray myarray=$(echo "one";echo "two")
>
> and reads and assignments, and 'lets'
> read ln < <(echo "one"; echo "two")
> ln2="one two"
> read ln3 <<< "one two"
>
> but if this isn't a potential for confusion:
>
>> function aa {
> read ln < <(echo "one"; echo "two")
> ln2="12"
> read ln3 <<< "one two"
> ar1=(one two)
> typeset -i ln2=34
> typeset -a ar1=(three four)
> }
>> whence aa
> aa is a function
> aa ()
> {
> read ln < <(echo "one"; echo "two");
> ln2="12";
> read ln3 <<< "one two";
> ar1=(one two);
> typeset -i ln2=34;
> typeset -a ar1=(three four)
> }
>> aa
>> declare -p ln ln2 ln3 ar1
> declare -- ln="one"
> declare -- ln2="12"
> declare -- ln3="one two"
> declare -a ar1='([0]="one" [1]="two")'
>
> !!! -- sure looks like I was trying to set the "type" of ln2
> and ar1... boy could that be confusing...
>
> ....
> So, how about a "shopt"
> to declare that **what's implicity declared in funcs, stays in funcs**
> maybe shopt -s vegasvars ?.....
>
> but seriously -- it's so odd that anything you declare explicitly
> becomes local, while implicit vars default to global --
> I know standards and compat must keep it that way... BUT
> it would have made more sense to have
> implicit vars in a function always be 'local'
> and maybe have explicit declarators be global
> (which has effectively been done with -g)...but
> originally, I also thought it strange that 'declare/typeset'
> were equivalent to 'local' inside a function.
>
> This way, you wouldn't have to change any syntax
> parsing functions and there certain isn't ANYTHING
> that would look like perl, even though perl was
> originally designed to be like shell with many shell standard
> functions built-in.
>
> ???
>
>
>
Maybe you can just use this? alias declare='declare -g'
---
xoxo iza
