On 7/15/15 11:25 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote: > OK, after a bit more testing, there is certainly something interesting > here that I don't quite understand, but which Chet probably will. > > I have two files: 'bad' and $'bad\nfile' > > I type: > > $ cat bad > > and press Tab twice. (The first does nothing visible.) This gives me > two completion choices: > > bad bad^Jfile > > If I press Ctrl-V Ctrl-J, the cursor moves to the next line. At this > point, further Tabbing (with or without characters) acts like a new > completion rather than a continuation of the previous completion, as > this bug report indicated.
I answered this in another message; it's not a bug. > > But if instead I type: > > $ cat 'bad > > and then press Tab twice, I get the same completion choices: > > bad bad^Jfile > > Then if I press Ctrl-V Ctrl-J Tab, I end up with: > > $ cat 'bad > file' > > So, quoting the filename works around the bug, but readline isn't quite > clever enough to do that on its own yet. Readline understands quoted strings using single and double quotes, and will allow you to quote the newline with a backslash. But when you present readline with unquoted word separators, it will use them to separate words. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/