On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Alexandre De Champeaux <a...@quartetfs.com>wrote:
> Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]: > Machine: x86_64 > OS: linux-gnu > Compiler: gcc > Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64' > -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' > -DCONF_VENDOR='redhat' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKAGE='bash' > -DSHELL -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I./include -I./lib -D_GNU_SOURCE > -DRECYCLES_PIDS -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions > -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fwrapv > uname output: Linux isv 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 13 18:24:36 > EDT 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Machine Type: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu > > Bash Version: 4.1 > Patch Level: 2 > Release Status: release > > Description: > The top command does not handle more than 100 cores. I also > attached two screenshots of the issue, one showing the output of the top > command, and the other of a custom script showing the CPU usage per numa > node (the server has 160 cores). > Here is the ouptu of a top -v : > [root@isv ~]# top -v > top: procps version 3.2.8 > > I did not try to reproduce on the latest version of top. > > > Repeat-By: > Find a pretty cool machine with quite a bunch of cores, and run an > highly parallel program :). > > -- > Alexandre > However, top is an external command and has nothing to do with bash, so you need to report this to its authors, or to the package maintainer(s) of your distribution.