On 11/14/2013 08:56 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 11/8/13 6:26 PM, John Dawson wrote: >> The following surprised me. I thought line 4 of the output, and certainly >> line 5 of the output, should have said "0 /dev/fd/63" too. Is this behavior >> a bug? > > I'm still looking at this. I have not had a great deal of time to > investigate.
Maybe interesting: With named pipes (some non-Linux platforms) this does hang after the first line. Not sure which behaviour actually is the Right Thing though. /haubi/
