On 10/15/13 1:02 PM, Andrey Osipov wrote:
> Chris Down <ch...@chrisdown.name> writes:
>
>> On 2013-10-04 09:35, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>> On 10/4/13 3:32 AM, Chris Down wrote:
>>>> On 2013-10-02 16:33, Andrey Osipov wrote:
>>>>> Is failglob meant to be used in interactive shell?
>>>>
>>>> Basically, you can't use it right now if you are using completions that
>>>> could
>>>> return empty globs.
>>>
>>> This just means that completions have failed to take empty globs into
>>> account, not that failglob is behaving in an unintended way.
>>
>> Right, but sadly most modules from bash-completion don't.
>
> That option hadn't failed the completion with bash 3.2 and even with 4.1
> In bash 4.2 completion and failglob stoped working toghether. I believe
> it's a bug.
If you believe it's a bug in bash, please supply me with an example that
doesn't rely on bash-completion that I can use to reproduce it. Thanks.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
