On 14 Jun 2013 10:21, "Linda Walsh" <b...@tlinx.org> wrote: >> Please, no more brittle export hacks. I'm already crying enough at function exports. > > > Brittle would be bad. Pliant and chewy would be much better, I agree. > > Perhaps you might explain what you mean by brittle? Like the export hacks > you get in the Antarctic in June? The word brittle with export doesn't > seem to fit very well. What happened to your functions? Don't they work?
You are aware of *how* they work, yes? (with apologies for the terse replies, I'm on my phone)
