On 4/23/13 2:05 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> As reported in http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?8025 , I would like to see the
> SIGRTMAX-n signal names disappear.
>
> Signals should never ever be addressed with SIGRTMAX-n. Signals should always
> be
> addressed with SIGRTMIN+n.
I'll take a look at this, but that's a pretty strong statement to make from
something that appears in one Linux man page. I can't find any shell in my
quick testing that behaves as you propose. Is there any other reason to do
this?
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
