2012-08-18 10:26:22 -0500, Dan Douglas:
> This is a feature that all shells with this style of compound assignment have 
> in common. If no explicit subscripts are given, the text between the 
> parentheses is processed exactly as though it were arguments to a command 
> including brace expansion, word-splitting, and pathname expansion (and 
> consequently, quoting is just as important). This is an important feature 
> because it allows storing the results of a glob in an array easily.
> 
> If a subscript is given explicitly, then the right-hand side of the 
> assignment 
> is treated exactly as an ordinary scalar assignment would be, including all 
> analagous behaviors for `+=' and the integer attribute.
> 
>  $ set -x; a=( [1]=* )
> + a=([1]=*)
[...]

Nope:

~/1$ touch '[1]=x'
~/1$ bash -c 'a=( [1]=* ); echo "${a[@]}"'
[1]=x
~/1$ bash -c 'a=( [1]=asd ); echo "${a[@]}"'
asd

That's a bug though.

Just do

a=("*") or a=('*') or a=(\*)

-- 
Stephane


Reply via email to