2012-08-18 10:26:22 -0500, Dan Douglas:
> This is a feature that all shells with this style of compound assignment have
> in common. If no explicit subscripts are given, the text between the
> parentheses is processed exactly as though it were arguments to a command
> including brace expansion, word-splitting, and pathname expansion (and
> consequently, quoting is just as important). This is an important feature
> because it allows storing the results of a glob in an array easily.
>
> If a subscript is given explicitly, then the right-hand side of the
> assignment
> is treated exactly as an ordinary scalar assignment would be, including all
> analagous behaviors for `+=' and the integer attribute.
>
> $ set -x; a=( [1]=* )
> + a=([1]=*)
[...]
Nope:
~/1$ touch '[1]=x'
~/1$ bash -c 'a=( [1]=* ); echo "${a[@]}"'
[1]=x
~/1$ bash -c 'a=( [1]=asd ); echo "${a[@]}"'
asd
That's a bug though.
Just do
a=("*") or a=('*') or a=(\*)
--
Stephane