On 07/25/2012 07:12 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 7/25/12 10:57 AM, Roman Rakus wrote:
And there is also a problem when you change the `ulimit -u' value.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832997
It's not clear to me that it's desirable to attempt to remember a
potentially unlimited number of process exit statuses. You have to
bound it somewhere.
Chet
Hmm... I don't know much about boundaries of maximum number of user
processes. But anyway - do you think that (re)changing js.c_childmax
(when `ulimit -u' is changed) is not good?
RR
