On 7/25/12 11:33 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> I cannot see how CHILD_MAX is related to pid reuse. CHILD_MAX is a
> per-user limit, but the pid namespace is global. If the shell forks a
> new process, and the pid of it matches one of the previously used pids
> for asynchronous jobs it can surely discard the remembered status for
> that job.
Thanks, that's a good restatement of the problem. Your proposed solution
is one of the possibles. The question is whether or not it's necessary
(apparently on some systems) and sufficient (probably).
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
