On 5/21/12 5:02 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> I.e. Unicode does specify ordering, so if your locale is set
> to UTF-8 character encoding, then it is explicitly defined. This would
> seem to be in conflict with unicode -- and any implementation claiming
> to be unicode compatible MUST use unicode ordering when the local character
> set is defined to be Unicode.
>
Then write the locale definitions that way -- that's Eric's point.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
