On 02/28/2012 11:15 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 2/28/12 5:07 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
>
>>> yhea but I think the point is that the current behavior is useless.
>>> there is no case where I want a " to be printed and start a double
>>> quoted string? and thats the current behavior.
>>>
>>>
>>> Not so important how you treat it just need to pick 1. then you can at
>>> least work with it. Now you have to use a temp variable.
>>>
>>>
>>> as a side note ksh93 is pretty good, intuitive
>>> ksh93 -c 'test=teststrtest ; echo "${test//str/"dd dd"}"'
>>> testdd ddtest
>>> ksh93 -c '( test=teststrtest ; echo ${test//str/"dd '\''dd"} )'
>>> testdd 'ddtest
>>
>> The real question is whether or not you do quote removal on the stuff
>> inside the braces when they're enclosed in double quotes. Double
>> quotes usually inhibit quote removal.
>>
>> The Posix "solution" to this is to require quote removal if a quote
>> character (backslash, single quote, double quote) is used to escape
>> or quote another character. Somewhere I have the reference to the
>> Austin group discussion on this.
>
> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=221
>
> Chet
This however doesn't make reference to changing that behavior if you
enclose the entire thing in double quotes.
${a//a/"a"} should behave the same as "${a//a/"a"}"
I mean the search and replace should behave the same. Currently they dont
