>You could also "disown -h" it and avoid that the signal is sent at all. >This is especially helpful, if a program resets its signal handlers >(e.g. xemacs?). What I am saying is, this is not working! Please try if you can reproduce what I wrote. If so try to use disown -h. Doesn't make a difference. >If you want a process to ignore a signal, you should either use nohup(1), >or ignore the signal yourself using a trap and then exec it. I know about nohup but I don't want to ignore a SIGHUP. My point is that there is a SIGHUP sent although it shouldn't. Or can you explain why this signal is being send in the first place? regards
SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! [1]http://f.web.de/?mc=021192 References 1. http://f.web.de/?mc=021192
