Hello everybody. Just my 2 cents about this ... On Monday 28 November 2011, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 11/28/11 4:48 AM, Roman Rakus wrote: > > On 11/28/2011 06:28 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> I don't think I'll push every change to git as soon as it happens, but > >>> > I'm thinking about fairly frequent commits to a `bash-devel' sort of > >>> > tree. The question is whether or not enough people would be interested > >>> > in that to make the frequency worth it. > >> i would;) > >> -mike > > me too > > OK, that's three. :-) > I can't say I'd be really "interested", but I surely would be curious, and would greatly appreciate the possibility of peeking into the bash developement process.
Apart from that, having a proper, faithful and easily avaiable VCS history would surely help future (so far only hypotetical) maintainers or co-maintainers of Bash. I can say this from experience, since my work as (relatively recent) automake co-maintainer has been and continues to be greatly helped and by the well preserved and fairly complete history in its source repository (history that, BTW, has been successfully preserved in the transition from CVS to git). Regards, Stefano
