-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/11 12:29 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 10:11 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:00:34PM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>> I wonder if a better way to handle this is to require the %s expansion
>>> at configure time and use the strftime replacement in lib/sh if the C
>>> library's strftime doesn't implement it. What systems, if you know, do
>>> not handle %s?
>>
>> HP-UX 10.20 and 11.11 are the ones I have. It's a somewhat commonly
>> requested feature among Solaris users too, but I don't know which
>> versions of Solaris they are using. There are probably many others.
>> At a guess, I would assume everything that isn't GNU/Linux or BSD.
>
> Gnulib already provides a strftime replacement that guarantees %s, which
> is handy since the next version of POSIX is considering requiring %s in
> strftime().
Bash already has Arnold's strftime for those systems that don't provide it,
and it implements %s.
Chet
- --
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk7NRwoACgkQu1hp8GTqdKu94ACeL7yFHDMaHgjv1ytZ9OvmgAm9
DS4Ani3cj1VXrbP9yuJEAf2iQANoY667
=w0fE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
