Eric Blake wrote: > What, me urgent? wrote: > >In my most recent post, the mailing list software replaced the string > >"address@hidden" for a section of code snippet! > > Not the list software, but merely the web archiver that you are > viewing the mail in. If you are actually subscribed to the list, > rather than viewing a web archiver, your post came through just > fine. ...
And if the mangling isn't there then people complain about it not mangling email addresses. Personally I don't like mangling at all. Let's face it, email addresses are useless if not known and once known cannot be hidden. But just the same I have experienced that people complain vehemently if you don't mangle addresses in the web archive. And then problems such as the above occur. Sigh. It is impossible to please both sets of people. Bob
