On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 03:09, Bradley M. Kuhn <bk...@ebb.org> wrote: > > Michael Witten replied a few minutes ago: >> it is my opinion that all further development should take place through >> a public, distributed repository such as the one you have created - >> regardless of Chet's objections. > > It seems that two different conversations have been conflated here. My > goal was to simply finish what Jari was seeking to do with > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git two years ago. I believe I have > succeed in that: specifically, putting all the historical information > currently available into a single git repository. I'm also offering to > maintain the same indefinitely. > > What you've raised another issue entirely that perhaps should be > discussed, but I hope it won't be conflated with what I was trying to do > by creating the Git repository. It's true that perhaps this Git > repository I created could be used as a basis to explore what you are > proposing, but the two issues are ultimately only tangentially related.
I take full responsibility for accusations of mutiny :-)
