On 3/28/11 1:53 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>
>
>
> Is it possible to have an 'Option' to make '[[' compatible
> with '[', w/rt pathname expansion?
Anything's possible. Likely? No.
> It seems counter-intuitive to have:
>
> d="/etc/rc.d/rc5.d"
> if [[ ! -e $d/S??sshd ]]; then echo "sshd not enabled"; fi
>
> give different output than:
>
> if [ ! -e $d/S??sshd ]; then echo "sshd not enabled"; fi
I don't consider it counterintuitive. You have to understand the
differences between [[ and [ and take them into account when you use
it. One of the basic features of [[, one of the fundamental reasons
it was created, was to not have the words undergo pathname expansion.
I don't think implementing an option to disable that is a good use of
time.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
