On 2/11/11 4:00 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> I already tried to discuss this, but you didn't reply ;) See
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08528.html
>
> So, if I understand correctly, you mean that
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> interactive_application
>
> echo DONE
>
> shouldn't be interrupted by SIGINT after interactive_application exits.
> For example, it can be a text-editor which treats SIGINT specially.
>
> But, in this case, shouldn't we fix the script above? In this case
> the shell and the application should not run in the same tty->pgrp
> group, or we can add "trap SIGINT".
That's not a scalable solution, and doesn't take into account all programs
that use SIGINT as a normal part of their processing and all scripts that
might call them.
I would argue that the intended bash behavior, modulo any race conditions
that exist, is what the user expects to happen.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU [email protected] http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
