On 5/30/10 4:22 AM, Jan Schampera wrote:

> If this is not a bug, what's the reason behind this? Is it to blindly
> report success when an operand "looks like a pathname"?

`hash' ignores operands with slashes.  It just doesn't consider them at
all.  They don't get into the hash table and they don't contribute to the
success or failure of the command.

Chet

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    c...@case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/

Reply via email to