"Matias A. Fonzo" <s...@dragora.org> writes:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:21:12 +0000
> Marc Herbert <marc.herb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Matias A. Fonzo a écrit :
>> > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:16:13 +0000
>> > Marc Herbert <marc.herb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> In case anyone is interested my winner (so far) is:
>> >>
>> >> exists()
>> >> {
>> >> [ -e "$1" -o -L "$1" ]
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> > The -L is redundant.
>>
>> Not for me. I need -L because I want to consider broken symlinks just
>> like anything else. A broken symlink would be a bug in my code and I want to
>> detect it ASAP.
>>
>>
>> > Because, if the symlink is not broken, the regular file "exists" ( -e ).
>>
>> Please forget about correct symlinks. The -L is here for *broken*
>> symlinks.
>>
>
> The [ -L "foo" -a ! -e "foo" ] is a specific case to check dangling symlinks.
Combine that with the existence check and you have exactly the
expression above.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
