Oh, cool. Thanks for correcting me! jon.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Eric Blake <e...@byu.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > According to Jon Seymour on 12/4/2009 4:00 PM: >> On Linux or any reasonable OS, I could do this remote dispatch easily >> with named pipes, but these don't exist on cygwin. > > That's where you're wrong. Named pipes DO exist on cygwin, although there > are still some bugs being hammered out when trying to have multiple > simultaneous writers to a named pipe. Also, whereas you can do <>pipe on > Linux, that won't work on cygwin (where named pipes must be read-only owr > write-only). > > - -- > Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! > > Eric Blake e...@byu.net > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) > Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAksZr0AACgkQ84KuGfSFAYBnbgCeMS9E6jFwocHi4WbOBKk+OTmH > G/0AoNZjXu/8oytboSqzbX2VIW9i1UIb > =PKzk > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
