On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote:
> > Are you saying you ran a script in which you enabled job > control, ran a job, turned job control off, then killed the job? > No, I didn't turn off job control. I use "set +m" to turn of monitoring only because I don't want to see any message about the job being terminated. > Bash and historical versions of sh report the status of jobs in a script > that exit as the result of being killed by a signal. I'm not going to > change that. > Isn't that the purpose of "set +m" ... to turn off monitoring? Thanks, Jeff
