Eric Blake wrote: > You missed word... (the ... is important). To keep it on one line, I'd > represent the bash syntax as: > > for name [ in [ name ... ] ; | ; ] do > > to show that bash supports four varints: 'in ;', 'in name... ;', ';', or > blank.
I prefer for name [ [in [word ...] ] ; ] do Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
