On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Pierre Gaston <p...@freeshell.org> wrote: > I have a couple of suggestions about coprocesses. > If I understood correctly how coproc works, I think that > instead of : > coproc [NAME] command [redirections] > > the documentation would be a little clearer with something like: > > coproc simple-command [redirections] > coproc NAME compound-command [redirections] >
hmm actually I just realized that it can also be: coproc compound-command [redirections] maybe then the manual could says something along the lines "if a NAME is used the command must be a compound command"
