Eric Blake wrote: > According to Poor Yorick: > | What's up with all the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" strings in the web archives for > | bug-bash? For example: > | > | http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2008-07/msg00063.html > > It is the gnu mailing archive's list way of protecting email address from > spammers, although it is over-anxious in its regex and ends up treating > almost anything containing @ as needing protection. There are other list > archives out there that do not do quite as much corruption; for example, > you can read the same message at: > > http://www.nabble.com/forum/Permalink.jtp?root=18519745&post=18527669&page=y
Since Nabble generates very annoying behaviors when used to send messages[1] let me suggest using Gmane instead. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.bash.bugs http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.bash.bugs/11566 Gmane seems to be one of the better web based mailing list and newgroup readers out there. Bob [1] For example Nabble apparently allows senders to edit their draft and send a message multiple times with the same message-id! So we get several messages sometimes different or sometimes the same but with the same message-id on all several messages. Yuck! It should at least create a unique message-id for every message.
