Matthew Woehlke wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > >You would probably need "q\n" in order to get the data flushed to the > >subprocess. This is probably a stdio buffering issue. When the stdio > >library determines that the output is not a tty then the output is > >buffered into large blocks for performance reasons. > > That doesn't sound right, wouldn't an fflush be better? The '\n' might > have undesired side effects.
I was taking that experience from using less inside of an emacs shell window. It works there. :^} Bob _______________________________________________ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash
