Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Schwab wrote: >><http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_09_01_01>: >> >> If a simple command results in a command name and an optional >> list of arguments, [...] > > But set() is not a simple command, it is a function definition, no?
Right, so defining the function should work, but calling it should not. paul _______________________________________________ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash
