On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 11:42 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > > BTW... Awk is used so much on a system that most likely it is already > in ram and is probably not as heavy of a system impact as you imply.
I don't think I was even considering the disk read time to load it. I think I was purely considering the cost of fork/exec. In any case, dead horses and all. b. -- My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server. Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash
