walter harms wrote:
> hi bash-developer,
> i used the bash test suite to check busybox ash and found
> two possible mistakes in the latest release.
[...]
>
> 1. func.tests:FUCNAME=7
> possible typo: FUNCNAME ?
Thanks, this is indeed a typo.
>
> 2. getopts5.sub: hardcoded interpreter path
That doesn't matter; it's never called as a command name.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Live Strong. No day but today.
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
_______________________________________________
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash
