Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-05 12:38 -0500]:
>> This has been a known issue with bison-1.75 for over three years:
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=167635;archive=yes
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2003-01/msg00061.html
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2004-09/msg00118.html
>
> If it's a known issue, why does the configure script select the
> bison-1.75 instead of the working yacc?
All things being equal, bash prefers bison. Yacc has its own issues,
especially in the area of reentrant parsers (calling yyparse()
recursively, for instance). All programs have bugs, and yacc has had
its share.
> If this can't be changed easily, perhaps you can add a note in INSTALL
> or somewhere else, warning people to use bison-1.75.
Good idea. This is good material for NOTES.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
( ``Discere est Dolere'' -- chet )
Live Strong. No day but today.
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
_______________________________________________
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash
