Hi Chet,

I think you said you'd fixed this bug.  Could you post the patch you
used please?

Thanks,
Tim.
*/

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:15:39PM +0000, Tim Waugh wrote:

> Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
> Machine: i386
> OS: linux-gnu
> Compiler: i386-redhat-linux-gcc
> Compilation CFLAGS:  -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i386' 
> -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i386-redhat-linux-gnu' 
> -DCONF_VENDOR='redhat' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKAGE='bash' 
> -DSHELL -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -I.  -I. -I./include -I./lib  -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE 
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -g -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -m32 -march=i386 
> -mtune=pentium4
> uname output: Linux gene.surrey.redhat.com 2.6.9-1.667 #1 Tue Nov 2 14:41:25 
> EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> Machine Type: i386-redhat-linux-gnu
> 
> Bash Version: 3.0
> Patch Level: 16
> Release Status: release
> 
> Description:
>       https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=146638
> 
>       This script fails:
> 
> ( (echo line1) \
> && (echo line2))
> ((echo line3) && (echo line4))
> ((echo line5) \
> && (echo line6))
> 
>        like this:
> 
> line1
> line2
> line3
> line4
> test.sh: line 5: syntax error near unexpected token `'
> test.sh: line 5: `&& (echo line6))'
> 
>       It seems as though the problem line might be being treated as
>       though it is a ((...)) compound command, rather than nested
>       subshells.
> 
> Repeat-By:
>       bash test.sh



> _______________________________________________
> Bug-bash mailing list
> Bug-bash@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash

Attachment: pgp5k6xbxrKqG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash

Reply via email to