Hi Karl, Karl Berry <k...@freefriends.org> writes:
> Hi Maxim - thanks for the report and doing the research to find that old > answer. Do you have any ideas for a better solution? I can't think of > one. We can't change Automake syntax now. Nor does it seem maintainble > for automake to have special knowledge of all of make's builtin > conditionals and match them too. > > I'll see about adding something to the manual about the workaround, > at least. --thanks, karl. The workaround got rid of the Automake syntax checks, but I faced more problems passed that. It was very confusing; the Make conditionals would not work as I expected. I could give it another look to see if I can distill some interesting points from that experiment; I still have my minimal example around. -- Thanks, Maxim
