Karl Berry wrote: > I just hope those weird-looking %:: rules do not cause trouble with > other makes. I guess we'll find out.
I tested the default 'make' of various OSes, before submitting the patch. Whether some other, rarely-used 'make' implementation has problems with it, we'll find out. > The fnoc test also failed due to the new rules. I fixed that I fixed it too, in the second version of the patch. Had a hard time distinguishing spurious and persistent test failures (see bug #64756). > added a few words of documentation and NEWS, and pushed it. Thanks! Bruno
