I could distribute just the .texi.in file and still get
autoreconf/automake/packaging to work. Right now, I get an error
about a missing .texi file
I thought Mike's fix (-e ... /dev/null) should already have fixed that?
Well, in any case, it's not bad to check for the .texi.in, so I'm happy
you posted about it.
> echo '@setfilename bar.texi' >foo.texi
Shouldn't the above read "bar.info" instead of "bar.texi"?
Oops, certainly so! Sharp eyes. Fortunately in my actual test file I got
it right, so I think my description of the (non-)behavior I saw still
stands ... --thanks again, karl.
P.S. Still working on several more patches from you. Thanks for all!
