Hi Karl. On 04/13/2012 11:36 PM, Karl Berry wrote: > Regarding automake.texi in 1.11.4. The whole point of the "Individual > utilities" section is to have an entry for the actual command names. > > I can understand the rationale of changing the "individual" automake to > automake-invocation, since the whole package is also named Automake. > However, there is no package named "aclocal", so can we again not have > the "-invocation" there, please? > I'd rather have consistency here, and keep the "aclocal-invocation" name.
Also, "info aclocal" seems to do the correct thing on my system anyway, even with the current naming: $ info aclocal File: automake-1.11.info, Node: aclocal Invocation, Next: ... 6.3 Auto-generating aclocal.m4 ============================== Automake includes a number of Autoconf macros that can be used in your package (*note Macros::); some of them are actually required by Automake in certain situations. These macros must be defined in your `aclocal.m4'; otherwise they will not be seen by `autoconf'. So the current naming is not even an inconvenience for the users of the command-line info reader. I'm thus closing this bug as "wontfix". Regards, Stefano
