Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-21 10:26: > On 01/20/2012 09:08 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-20 20:53: >>> On 01/19/2012 02:45 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >>>> >>>> [SNIP] >>>> >>>> So, to all autoconfers: do you happen to know any reason for which Automake >>>> should use F77FLAGS? If not, I'll assume that is due to a typo or clerical >>>> mistake, and fix it (in 48 hours or so). >>>> >>> The attached patch should take care of this. I'll push it tomorrow if there >>> is no objection. >> >> Isn't this worthy of a NEWS entry? Or does it not affect end users at all? >> > The bug only affected the "hints" printed by automake in some error messages > (e.g., "The usual way to define `F77' is to add AC_PROG_F77 to configure.ac"), > and I believe that is so minor not to require a NEWS entry. Anyway, I see > this fact wasn't apparent from my commit message, so I've amended it to be > clearer. Attached is the patch I've pushed. If you are still convinced it > deserves a NEWS entry anyway, feel free to write one; I won't object.
Ok, in that case a NEWS entry is not needed. I should have mentioned that I only thought it was needed in case you had forgotten about it... Cheers, Peter
