On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > I think the idea is that if autoconf detects that PCH is available and > automake generates the correct compiler commands to use it, it will be there > "for free" to any user of the autotools. Builds just get magically faster.
I don't think that's doable and it certainly shouldn't be the first goal. Deciding which headers should go into the pch header is a manul process. > I'm sure you care nothing for Visual C++, but most of the people begging for > PCH support are probably coming from this world. I'm not using automake to target VC. :p -- Olaf
