Hi Sam, and thanks for the report. I'll try to look at one failure at the time ...
On Monday 28 March 2011, Sam Steingold wrote: > ===================================== > 3 of 657 tests failed > (78 tests were not run) > See tests/test-suite.log <<-- appended > Please report to bug-automake@gnu.org > ===================================== > > Linux 2.6.18-164.el5 > CentOS release 5.5 > GNU M4 1.4.5 > > > FAIL: silent5.test (exit: 1) > ============================ > > /home/sds/src/automake-1.11.1/tests:/home/sds/src/top/bin:/usr/lib6 > 4/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/NX > /bin:/home/sds/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/NX/bin:/usr/NX/bin:/home/sd > s/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/NX/bin:/home/sds/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin > silent5: running g++ --version > g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48) > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. > There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR > A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > silent5: running gfortran --version > GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48) > Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > GNU Fortran comes with NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. > You may redistribute copies of GNU Fortran > under the terms of the GNU General Public License. > For more information about these matters, see the file named > COPYING > > silent5: running flex --version > flex version 2.5.4 > silent5: running bison --version > bison (GNU Bison) 2.3 > Written by Robert Corbett and Richard Stallman. > > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. > There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR > A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. === Running test ./silent5.test > ++ pwd > /home/sds/src/automake-1.11.1/tests/silent5.dir > + set -e > + mkdir sub > + cat > + cat > + cat > + cat > + cat > + cat > + cat > + cat > + cp foo1.cpp bar.c > + cp foo1.cpp sub/baz.c > + cp foo1.cpp sub/bla.c > + cp foo1.cpp sub/baz1.cpp > + cp foo2.f90 sub/baz2.f90 > + cp foo3.f sub/baz3.f > + cp foo5.l sub/baz5.l > + cp foo6.y sub/baz6.y > + aclocal-1.11 -Werror > + automake-1.11 --foreign -Werror -Wall --add-missing > configure.in:5: installing `./compile' > configure.in: installing `./ylwrap' > + autoconf > + for config_args in ''\'''\''' > am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type=gcc + ./configure > --enable-silent-rules > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c > checking whether build environment is sane... yes > checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p > checking for gawk... gawk > checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes > checking for style of include used by make... GNU > checking for gcc... gcc > checking whether the C compiler works... yes > checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out > checking for suffix of executables... > checking whether we are cross compiling... no > checking for suffix of object files... o > checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes > checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes > checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed > checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 > checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes > checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes > checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes > checking dependency style of g++... gcc3 > checking for g77... no > checking for xlf... no > checking for f77... no > checking for frt... no > checking for pgf77... no > checking for cf77... no > checking for fort77... no > checking for fl32... no > checking for af77... no > checking for xlf90... no > checking for f90... no > checking for pgf90... no > checking for pghpf... no > checking for epcf90... no > checking for gfortran... gfortran > So far, so good ... > checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... no > What, gfortran is not the GNU fortran compiler? This looks fishy... > checking whether gfortran accepts -g... no > checking for gfortran... gfortran > checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran compiler... no > Ditto. > checking whether gfortran accepts -g... no > checking for flex... flex > checking lex output file root... lex.yy > checking lex library... -lfl > checking whether yytext is a pointer... yes > checking for bison... bison -y > configure: creating ./config.status > config.status: creating Makefile > config.status: creating sub/Makefile > config.status: executing depfiles commands > + make > /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/f951: symbol lookup > error: /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/f951: undefined > symbol: __gmpn_sqr_n make[3]: *** [baz2.o] Error 1 > Hmm... this seems like a bug in your Fortran compiler. By googling I found this: <http://130.237.222.241/list-archives/gmp-discuss/2010-November/004365.html> with this answer: <http://130.237.222.241/list-archives/gmp-discuss/2010-November/004366.html> Could it be related to the failure above? More importantly, could you confirm that failure is indeed due (as I suspect) to a bug in your compiler, and not to a bug in automake or in its testsuite? Thanks, Stefano
