Hi Jim, Jim <[email protected]> writes:
> OK. I will add some more comments. I didn't want to make the > Changelog message too long, but I will try to provide more detail > without making it into some sort of "War and Peace" competitor. Please keep the bug tracker in Cc; I'm re-adding it again. Thanks, the idea is to have a brief description about the changes; I think you know where to go 👍 > I did my initial editing of these files in another directory without that > .dir-locals.el file. Mea culpa. > > I have untabified both tex.el and context.el. Thanks. > While on the subject of .dir-locals.el... > What do you think of the idea of adding some stuff to that file to enforce > more style conventions there? > > I ask because when I am in the git directory, and hit the tab key (which > for me, anyway, is set to `indent-for-tab-command', it changes the > indentation of some of the lines in the file which are original (untouched > by my changes). For example, should the above have > (lisp-body-indent 2) > ? (I use 4). In general, we/I took most of that content from the .dir-locals.el shipped with Emacs itself. I just added an entry for `lisp-body-indent' setting it to 2. > And there are places where the "then clause" of an "(if" get indented > differently if I hit tab on those lines. I don't know if that is me, or > whether some of the AUCTeX code does not follow "standard, built-in" rules. You can test the above by starting Emacs with 'emacs -Q' and then giving it another try. Otherwise, please show the code and we try to investigate. In general, AUCTeX follows the standard, built-in rules, exceptions are documented in .dir-locals.el in our repo. > In other words, I am not sure about the indentation and other formatting > rules expected for AUCTeX elisp code... if there are any more variable > settings that would enforce the expected settings, in the light of > different contributors having their own opinions on formatting issues, it > would probably be helpful. That is an iterative process, I'm afraid. As said above, AUCTeX sticks with standards, and if you get other results, we can adjust our .dir-locals.el, but we need input from users side what they have changed. > OK, that would be great. I'll try to get that patch out in the next > hour or two. Great, thanks! Best, Arash _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
