[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan Kelly updated BOOKKEEPER-769:
----------------------------------
Description:
As the license issue, isn't forcing the issue right now, I'd like to change
this to a general discussion of the future of hedwig. Almost all the comments
about the c++ client apply to hedwig as a whole. Hedwig has only had 5 real
changes in the last year, only one in 2014. For all intensive purposes, it is
inactive, unmaintained and unsupported. AFAIK, noone is using it in production
in anything close to the form of the apache codebase.
However, by having it in the codebase, at the same level of bookkeeper-server,
we are indicating to users that it is in fact supported software and considered
as important as bookkeeper-server. So, I would like to propose that, after the
4.3.0 release, we remove hedwig from the codebase. Obviously, it will still be
available in in git/svn.
-The hedwig c++ client has not had any real code change since november 2012. It
is not built as part of the main build. It is not tested as part of the main
build. It is effectively unmaintained.-
-In addition to this, it contains m4 files whose license status is unclear.-
-I propose we simple remove it from trunk and branch-4.2. The license issue is
currently blocking the release of 4.2.3. [~jiannan], [~farrellee], you were the
last people to submit anything for the client. Are you using in production? Any
objection to its removal from the main code tree?-
was:
The hedwig c++ client has not had any real code change since november 2012. It
is not built as part of the main build. It is not tested as part of the main
build. It is effectively unmaintained.
In addition to this, it contains m4 files whose license status is unclear.
I propose we simple remove it from trunk and branch-4.2. The license issue is
currently blocking the release of 4.2.3. [~jiannan], [~farrellee], you were the
last people to submit anything for the client. Are you using in production? Any
objection to its removal from the main code tree?
> [DISCUSS] Remove hedwig from source tree
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-769
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-769
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ivan Kelly
> Fix For: 4.4.0
>
>
> As the license issue, isn't forcing the issue right now, I'd like to change
> this to a general discussion of the future of hedwig. Almost all the comments
> about the c++ client apply to hedwig as a whole. Hedwig has only had 5 real
> changes in the last year, only one in 2014. For all intensive purposes, it is
> inactive, unmaintained and unsupported. AFAIK, noone is using it in
> production in anything close to the form of the apache codebase.
> However, by having it in the codebase, at the same level of
> bookkeeper-server, we are indicating to users that it is in fact supported
> software and considered as important as bookkeeper-server. So, I would like
> to propose that, after the 4.3.0 release, we remove hedwig from the codebase.
> Obviously, it will still be available in in git/svn.
> -The hedwig c++ client has not had any real code change since november 2012.
> It is not built as part of the main build. It is not tested as part of the
> main build. It is effectively unmaintained.-
> -In addition to this, it contains m4 files whose license status is unclear.-
> -I propose we simple remove it from trunk and branch-4.2. The license issue
> is currently blocking the release of 4.2.3. [~jiannan], [~farrellee], you
> were the last people to submit anything for the client. Are you using in
> production? Any objection to its removal from the main code tree?-
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
