Thanks for getting back, Kevan. For 1, we do have a specification file, from which those files are generated, and the specification files include the license header.
-Flavio On 19 Jun 2014, at 16:39, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Flavio Junqueira > <[email protected]> wrote: > 1- We have a couple of files that are automatically generated, more > specifically, they are generated by the protocol buffers compiler. Do they > need to include the Apache license? > > No. Presumably it is generated from your source code? Is there a reason you > don't create these files at build time? > > 2- We've needed to include some files from the boost c++ libraries, and they > include a license like this: > > # LICENSE > # > # Copyright (c) 2008 Thomas Porschberg <[email protected]> > # Copyright (c) 2008 Pete Greenwell <[email protected]> > # > # Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification, are > # permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright notice > # and this notice are preserved. This file is offered as-is, without any > # warranty. > > Is this ok to include in a release? > > Yes. Seems fine to me. I know it's used by other projects. I don't see it in > the approved license list, but there has been some discussions, previously... > > --kevan >
