Is there some way to use both GPUS and get the correct app running on the 
correct device?

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)

-----Original Message-----
From: David Anderson [[email protected]]
Received: Thursday, 02 Oct 2014, 11:06AM
To: McLeod, John [[email protected]]; [email protected] 
[[email protected]]
Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] BOINCscheduling & plan class possible issue

Yes.
You can also use <exclude_gpu> to be more specific
about which GPU to use for which project.

On 02-Oct-2014 4:59 PM, McLeod, John wrote:
> Would that then prevent BOINC from running tasks on some of the GPS for any 
> tasks?
>
> Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown 
> (www.nitrodesk.com<http://www.nitrodesk.com>)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* David Anderson [[email protected]]
> *Received:* Thursday, 02 Oct 2014, 10:58AM
> *To:* [email protected] [[email protected]]
> *Subject:* Re: [boinc_dev] BOINCscheduling & plan class possible issue
>
> I assume these are cases where the user has set <use_all_gpus>.
> If that flag is removed the problem should go away.
> -- David
>
> On 02-Oct-2014 4:28 PM, Raistmer the Sorcerer wrote:
>> It was discovered that OpenCL AstroPulse application in SETI can't properly 
>> work
>> under 340.52 nVidia driver on pre-FERMI hardware (single pulses missing, 
>> issue
>> reported and reproduced by NV already). To avoid wrong computations Eric 
>> created
>> 2 plan classes that should avoid work sending on pre-FERMI GPUs running under
>> that faulty driver.
>>
>> But it was discovered (look here:
>>http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/forum_thread.php?id=2182&postid=52632  )
>> that multi-GPU hosts containing both FERMI and pre-FERMI GPUs are able to 
>> recive
>> tasks under another common plan class for FERMI devices and execute those 
>> recived
>> tasks on pre-FERMI devices. That is, though server obey plan class and ignore
>> pre-FERMI devices on 340.52 driver, BOINC client doesn't obey plan class and
>> schedule to run tasks for FERMI devices on pre-FERMI ones (when both present 
>> in
>> host).
>>
>> Could someone confirm this issue? And how one should act to exclude pre-FERMI
>> devices on 340.52 driver in such case of mixed NV devices in host?
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> boinc_dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
> (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.

Reply via email to