The abandoning of tasks happens when the BOINC server 'thinks' that it has 
'evidence' that the client has detached from the project and then re-attached 
again. This has affected a number of users in the past, but has proved 
extremely tricky to diagnose and resolve: not least, because most of the 
evidence resides in the server logs.

We did investigate one suspected case at Albert during credit testing, but that 
turned out to be a genuine 'detach' caused by hard disk failure - it is 
distinguished from reports like this one because no running tasks were left on 
the host computer (they were on the drive that failed...) to waste time and 
electricity.

I would certainly welcome it if we could pair up a developer and a project 
administrator with access to server logs to investigate this problem and cure 
it at source.

The checkpointing question is a matter for the project developers, and I'll 
leave it to them to respond via this list.



>________________________________
> From: Luc A. Germain <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Friday, 8 August 2014, 9:41
>Subject: [boinc_dev] astropulse robustness / abandonned tasks
> 
>
>Hi,
>Two things:
>1) A suggestion here for you develloppers ;-) As atropulse tasks take "some" 
>time to complete they are more prone to power failure as we have in the third 
>world. When it happens most of the time the task restarts computing from start 
>(this is even more frustrating when the task reaches near completion). Could 
>it be possible to introduce regular checkpoints by saving intermediate data, 
>or work files, where the task computing could restart from, saving so a lot of 
>computing time ? Maybe this could be an option in the user profile as I guess 
>not everyone needs this.
>
>2) Two days ago I sent a message about abandonned tasks. Since, all my 
>computing goes to the garbage bin as they are not taken into account. Which 
>procedure should/could I try to solve this problem ? Could 
>uninstalling/reinstalling the application from my computers be a solution? 
>Should I wait till the problem solves by itself (and would this not take ages) 
>?
>
>An answer would be highly appreciated.
>
>Best regards and thanks for your work,
>Luc
>_______________________________________________
>boinc_dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
>To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
>(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.

Reply via email to