Tavis Curry wrote: > Mmmmm...hawt and hot! > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Rom Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Article: >> >> http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10407818-264.html?tag=newsLatestHeadli >> nesArea.0 >> >> >> >> I wonder how busy BOINC can keep that.
Non-broken link: http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10407818-264.html Note: "The cores themselves aren't terribly powerful--more like lower-end Atom processors than Intel's flagship Nehalem models" Looks more like a catch-up attempt to chase Tilera: http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/10/tilera-100-cores/ It does suggest that Boinc will need to develop to support massive parallelisation of the science applications on individual hosts. And JM7 thought scheduling for GPUs was easy...? ;-) Regards, Martin -- -------------------- Martin Lomas m_boincdev ml1 co uk.ddSPAM.dd -------------------- _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
