Hi Alex, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Did I misread, or isn't the impugned clause (“Der Vorstand ist in seiner > Vertretungsmacht durch den Zweck der Stiftung beschränkt.”) still present in > the amended version ? > That clause got added - it wasn't there before.
> My question is one purely of professional curiosity, as a lawyer, > trying to understand the ratio decidendi as to why the change was > felt necessary. > In the cited decision, that clause helped to strike down a contract as invalid, that would have otherwise been harmful to that other foundation. Best, Thorsten -- Thorsten Behrens, Director, Member of the Board The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, Germany Rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
