Hi Andreas, all,

Andreas Mantke wrote:
> It seemed there is a approach behind this behavior: postpone the whole
> topic as far as possible. And try to frustrate the members who try to
> drive this topic forward. And prevent this project in the end or to vary
> it that it will not disturb own interests or support them.
> 
I don't think that's a fair conclusion of what's happening.

To me, Michael Weghorn's explanation appears much closer to the
truth. After all, whatever proposal will be there to vote on, needs
the backing of as many board members as possible - it is therefore
very important to work out a consensus.

And I'm sure we can get there, if we all work together.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to